(Don’t take this map too seriously, I found it on another social media, not an academic paper).

  • frank@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    I hate that argument.

    “People who are taking more than they give will leave if we ask them to pay their fair share!”

    Fucking grand, get out. Or better yet, pay up. Best case, pay and leave.

    • Szyler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The argument that makes more sense I’ve seen in this line of thought is that it will stop NEW investment in your country by people on the outside. If someone is expanding and considering your country or another with less taxes, they will go there and not give your country the value growth of their business, leading to less taxes for you. The low tax is incentive to come invest.

      • frank@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        On the surface sure but in reality I kinda double down. Like if future dodging taxes is a requirement for you investing then like, no thanks? Cuz the people really paying the taxes long term will be the middle and lower class again

        • Szyler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Same. But I think their argument is that the investment is a net positive, but only if you actually get them to invest in your country and not the neighbours.

          I can see why they would think that, but I agree with you that in reality it isn’t beneficial.

          Id rather have internal companies invest in that hole in the market than reduce the taxes to have someone foreign invest in it, while moving a lot of that money out, leaving a tiny surplus. It would be better for that internal investment to leave a LARGE surplus, and have no money leave.