This is real life news, not a TV show.

Get off social media for a bit.

Full results: https://www.gpblog.com/en/breaking-news/antonelli-writes-monza-fairytale-with-sensational-charge-from-p19-to-victory

(F1.com not yet updated at time of writing)

Flatpak yes, version on Flathub is some different fork from a few years ago. I hope this maintained version will replace the other one soon.

Maybe work on your own reading comprehension before saying something stupid.

Unlike you I actually checked the history of merged PRs on Github.

That’s an alarming number of changes at once.

At once? WTF? The latest update is only “Fixed level transitions”. That’s over various forks over literally 26 years. There are exact dates at each of the sections.

I’m going to need to know their stance on “AI” use before this comes anywhere near my computer.

Maybe learn how to read dates before accusing 26 years of updates to be the result of AI.

Full decision document

Reminder that FOM, not the FIA, is the timekeeper and made the original mistake and driver who didn’t cut corners weren’t affected, see Antonelli.

but is FIA not responsible for checking them?

Even after I directly linked the decision document and referenced the specific subsection, you still don’t know who the timekeeper is.

complete amateur hour from FIA. Sensors in wrong places

The FIA didn’t place the sensors. Had you read and linked the actual decision document, you’d know this. It’s spelled out under subsection 2 of “I. Reminder of the facts” that it was the FOM who messed up the timing.

flipflopping with their decisions.

That’s what an appeal is.

I’m really not a fan of MBS and his club but here you’re the one who’s completely wrong.

Good ol’ fashioned corruption.

They write down that the current feature set will not be paywalled but mandatory account registration and paywalling future features are absolutely on the table.

Only partially. Apparently Direct2D (which to be clear is different from Direct3D) is very weird and progress is slow.

slopifying his codebase.

He didn’t. That’s the point. The slop code is a self contained dependency only used for the Linux build and not part of the actual paint.net codebase. His core user group (on Windows) will never get in touch with it.

I think everybody, including him, would prefer if there was a working implementation of Direct2D for Wine.

I think the point is that the developers doesn’t want to actually review the code which they can do with a self contained dependency which they then ship on a “take it or leave it” basis.

I kind of get it and I think it’s a more responsible approach than to vibe code the core engine of their application.

Aren’t Florida Cubans pro Trump because they think he’ll overthrow the Cuban government?

His government works toward Greater Israel which is why they won’t ever leave the occupied Lebanese and Syrian territories either.

https://www.eurasiantimes.com/netanyahus-greater-israel-remarks/

Direct link to announcement instead of low effort spam blog: https://www.ubisoft.com/en-gb/game/for-honor/news-updates/4WKJhG6v6C9sbCOZkFZ6wG/ranked-faq

Relevant part:

Competitive Update

Warriors, we are happy to announce that For Honor’s competitive experience is leveling up with the launch of Ranked Dominion and the rework of Ranked Duel.

The chance to prove yourself on a global level is here!

To reinforce a fair competitive environment, the team is introducing additional player safety measures. We are removing For Honor from the Linux platform to ensure a safer environment for our players as we cannot meaningfully deploy protection on this platform. This means that For Honor will no longer be playable on Steam Deck starting September 10th. We will continue to investigate different ways to improve our anti-cheat with the possibility of reopening the platform in the future.

That hardware requirement is something they could work on for upcoming phones.

That’s gonna require a substantial amount more proof than a philosophical position taken by Linus Torvalds

“Linus Torvalds used AI to fix a Linux bug” <-- literally spelled out in the headline.

1600 commits contain the word “claude” alone: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Atorvalds%2Flinux+claude&type=commits

It’s so easy to find out, yet you insist that you are right. Hilarious.

How do you figure that?

It’s literally spelled out in the submitted article as well as https://www.xda-developers.com/linus-torvalds-will-loudly-ignore-anyone-criticising-ai-code-in-linux-fork-it-or-just-walk-away/ which is prominently linked from that article. Read first, comment later, don’t downvote others just because you are wrong.

Maybe get an M2-series Mac and go all-in on Asahi Linux?

That’s still Linux with Torvalds-approved LLM generated code. If you care about avoiding LLM code, all Linux is now poisoned.