Also the Herald of Free Enterprise and Chernobyl.

Figuratively watched. It’s when you watch figure skaters.

We didn’t start the fire. It was always burning since the world’s been turning. No we didn’t light it, but we tried to fight it.

I think they usually bring negligible improvements in visual fidelity, provided the traditional methods are well implemented.

I also think it’s silly to focus on these while the physics coding hasn’t kept up. Even showcase trailers often have weapons clipping through armour. A slightly more realistic shadow isn’t going to immerse me into your world if the slightest touch sends a huge bear carcass flying through the air or my sword clips through walls.

Zed’s dead, baby. Zed’s dead.

This didn’t “reveal differences in human perception”. Those differences were well known already. What was lacking - and still is, as far as I know - is a good model of human colour perception.

Nobody puts baby in a corner.

As someone who played the original Prince of Persia, Sands of Time still feels like “the new one”.

In my experience, immature posts are made by people well over 13.

I will continue to defend Andromeda. Yes it has its flaws, but no more than the original trilogy. It could’ve been the start of a cool new trilogy.

Very likely - but that’s not going to happen. Some people will watch less, some will complain but keep watching the same amount, and the majority will just take it as a fact of life and not change their behaviour.

Fascinating- I don’t speak Danish but I can _almost_read that. Enough to assume it has to do with thyroids and lymph nodes.

How do you get them to wear that?

I’m pretty sure an apple rolling over a keyboard would produce more coherent output than many pundits.