• tornavish@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    That’s the point. Make you poor and unable to choose. Good thing Kamala didn’t win though, we really lucked out avoiding “business as usual” bullshit.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      This is what I don’t understand. Do people not factor the consequences of giving the orange buffoon power again and the impact that choice has on their own country, economy and system of government, nevermind what is happening half a world away?

      • beella@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        People are tired of falling in line for a party that doesn’t support them.

        It’s an easy fix, just start nominating progressive candidates.

        The only issue is that upper middle class white folks will have to pay more in taxes, so they’d rather have Trump.

        It’s all about the money, and money brings out the worst in people.

        • Aneb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 minutes ago

          I was saying to my older friends that AOC should really be running for president because in a lot of ways she brings with her Bernie ideologies, my friend told me that Democrats need to run a moderate candidate. She is a great progressive who fights bullies, instead of making backroom deals with them. I really hope Mamdani wins in New York and will signal that people really want progressives in office. AOC would be an amazing president because she actually puts the work into listening to people and acting on it.

      • tornavish@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I think a lot of people in this world enjoy watching the suffering of others. I’ve noticed quite a number of people who claim to be lefties on here who seem to be perfectly fine with people suffering because they are suffering themselves.

        They are the kind of people who would get angry and abstain from voting if they did not qualify for student loan forgiveness. They are not OK with one group of people having a win unless they are in that group of people.

    • beella@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      9 hours ago

      If Kamala won, you wouldn’t be upset even though the working class is still losing.

      All you’d be saying for her wet-noodle policies is “at least it’s not Trump!”

      You people really need to stop pretending that Kamala’s victory would be your victory. They’re all victories for the ruling class.

      • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This is what will give trump another term

        Exactly this right here - the perfect is the enemy of the good

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yep. 100%. And it seems the algorithms push this kind of thinking everywhere. Used to be this lazy “both sides” take was just a thing you usually heard kind of on the margins, and mostly in-person, usually from someone that was either a Libertarian, a Communist, or just someone incredibly tuned out of everything, but wants to sound really profound. 🙄

          Now it’s just all over the place. It’s a great way to atomize much of the left and demoralize just enough people so that they don’t turn out for Democrats.

          And remember - no matter how much these types might actually believe their schtick (and aren’t just paid actors or bots) and stamp their feet, there are exactly TWO viable options at the ballot box when it comes down to the general.

          Talking about woulda coulda shoulda and being a precious purity pony is just a circle jerk, and nothing else.

        • beella@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Eh, more like the good is the enemy of the lesser and greater evils which is why we can’t have good candidates.

        • etherphon@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          People lost their minds, there is not going to be a perfect candidate, this is not a perfect world, shit is fucked up all over the place the best you can do it make it slightly less fucked up. You can’t fix everything at once and sorry the two party system is here to stay for a while it seems so suck it up.

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          You have no principals, if you did, you’d oppose those directly in opposition of your principals.

          Instead you call evil imperfect because it doesn’t harm you and yours. You’re part of the problem, you’re why the Democrats feel comfortable running a campaign to the right of GWB’s, 20 more years and you’d be voting for everything Trump is doing today and calling it imperfect.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        All you’d be saying for her wet-noodle policies is “at least it’s not Trump!”

        Yes, but we’d be stressing the point that the better of two options is the one that prevailed. The onus is on the losers to provide a better and more appealing candidate next time. It’s like natural selection.

        In Canada, we chose the least-worse option. It’s not a great option, but it’s far better than the worst. We’re hoping to see more support for an even better option.

      • tornavish@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’d be upset, I dislike her very much. However, we wouldn’t be watching SNAP benefits disappear. Women wouldn’t be denied abortions. We wouldn’t have ICE standing around in masks shooting civilians with paint balls.

        The real problem is people like you. People who think we have to make everyone suffer. That burn it down and rebuild it lie, or the “reset” button. Sure, you can burn it down and press reset, it reset is slavery and feudalism.

        Good luck!

        • beella@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          If it upsets you so much, you can do something about it.

          Start supporting better candidates and encourage others to do the same.

          Once we nominate a candidate that actually cares about the working class, then we can stop having this discussion and focus on solving real problems.

          • tornavish@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 hours ago

            That is not how politics actually works.

            I do support better candidates… In the primary… But then I vote for the person who is the least likely to destroy everything.

            That’s the problem with 2024. The Democrats never had a primary. That was wrong. Nobody wanted her. And just because you don’t like the candidates doesn’t mean you’re not supposed to vote.

            I think what a lot of uneducated lefties forget is that “better” is subjective, and that positive change happens in very small amounts–whereas negative change usually happens in huge chunks.

            But if you really want to know what I think, I feel humanity is far too flawed to get beyond where we are right now as a society. I mean, look at us, we are sitting here arguing and probably on generally the same side. There is zero hope.

            • mufasio@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              You were willing to overlook a genocide. We are not on the same side. Maybe one day you will come around to my side and we will welcome you. I will never come around to your side.

    • Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The sad thing is that anyone who’s been paying attention could tell she was never going to win against a rich white man.

      She was calm yet passionate.

      She was intelligent yet down to earth.

      She was serious but not afraid to laugh at bullshit from the GOP.

      She had amazing policies that benefited the middle and lower class on both sides.

      None of that ever mattered. She was never going to win against a rich white man.

      The DNC fucked up big time.

      • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        wtf are you talking about

        harris had a celebrity filled gala where republicans were invited but the people speaking on behalf of the middle and lower class and about policies that would benefit them and everyone else were locked outside and were not permitted in

        what policies she was just some lawyer from california who after dating her boss got a higher position at work afterwards

        In 1990, Harris was hired as a deputy district attorney in Alameda County, California, where she was described as “an able prosecutor on the way up”.[29] In 1994, Speaker of the California Assembly Willie Brown, who was then dating Harris, appointed her to the state Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board and later to the California Medical Assistance Commission.[29]

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris

        didnt lose to whitey she is a whitey

          • beella@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Maybe we should stop playing their game instead of being a bunch of little bitches?

            Just an idea.

            • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 hours ago

              First rule of life – Either change the rules or change the game, because playing their game by their rules means you’re guaranteed to lose.

              • tornavish@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 hours ago

                I don’t think those rules actually ever worked. You can’t change the game of life—you have to play it.