Jeffrey Epstein has claimed that Hillary Clinton had a sexual relationship with former attorney Vince Foster. This assertion comes in the wake of ongoing investigations into Epstein"s activities and connections.

Vince Foster, who served as Deputy White House Counsel during the Clinton administration, died by suicide under circumstances that have been described as mysterious in 1993. His death has been the subject of various conspiracy theories and investigations over the years.

This latest claim by Epstein adds to the controversy surrounding his past associations and statements. Epstein has previously been involved in various political discussions, including proposing individuals to Peter Thiel and other officials in emails, as reported in recent developments.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Go read the link. It’s a trash site made by Republicans and your dumb/sus ass fell for it.

      MBFC is bad because it estimates establishment sites as left leaning and is unreliable on what counts as a fact, not because it accidentally calls progressives conservative or makes up evidence whole cloth about poorly disguised conservative ops.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        You’re literally linking a Zionist propaganda website in order to sourcebro. I’m not going to click your link for the exact same reason you pretend to not read this article which you seem to be unable to factually address because you know everything in my post is true already.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Got any more hot goss from the right bud? Maybe some deep pulls about Pizzagate or something about Elizabeth Warren violently domming marines.

          If you’re not just in on the op yourself, you’re a clown with zero media literacy who doesn’t even want to question whether he’s being played. The whole story was sus as hell and you never even wondered who this brand new source was. Website said “progressive” so it must be progressive.

          • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            And there it is the barrage of low tier insults because you have no argument.

            Linking a Zionist website to sourcebro… Please link a credible site next time.

              • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Wow great now I know the site is just as unreliable as literally every other propaganda website like NYT and Reuters.

                How about taking the same effort to debunk the content of the article if you believe there is anything untrue in there.

                • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  There nothing to debunk because this isn’t a news story. Epstein, who has no particular reason to have inside information about an affair, said an affair happened, something that isn’t itself illegal or particularly relevant to anyone who hasn’t been eagerly looking for rumors to stir up conservative conspiracy theorists and distract from all the other Epstein revelations.

                  My first post said all of this. It wasn’t questioning whether the story was true. I, an actual progressive, simply don’t care because it’s not newsworthy to progressive political discussion even if it is. Why do you think this is an important piece of news?

                  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 hours ago

                    It’s news because it’s in the files which just came out. Apparently Epstein was close enough to Hillary or Vince at the time to know they had a relationship. Vince’s ‘suicide’ could also have relations to Epstein too. But not much is known.

                    This is simply a piece of a puzzle of which the rest of the puzzle is missing. By itself it doesn’t answer anything, but it certainly is news and politics.

                    Do you also think Trumps presence in the Epstein files has no relevance to politics? Or can you think one up? Also who’s this?