Please help keeping these monsters of our streets. It will save lives.

  • Horsey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Toyota, particularly, hasn’t kept up with advances in infotainment technology. Their infotainment is literally no better than it was in 08. Honda infotainment is slightly better, but still stuck with terribly low resolution, and only a 9”ish screen. Pretty much any other company will be a better buy than those 2 right now. Remember, the infotainment in every new car is the entire heart of the car, so you’re forced to live with it; you can’t just swap out infotainment screens for something better like you used to be able to do.

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      9 inch infotainment is plenty. The purpose of a car is to travel, not watch SpongeBob Squarepants.

      Infotainment replacements are out there, but often lack support for some specific vehicle options. If the connections were more standardized like the old radios it would certainly be nice.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I hate infotainment and technology in cars so, go Toyota!

      Give me efi and maybe abs (most of my cars dont have abs anyway)

      Tech Junk makes all cars more expensive and prone to failure and impossible to repair, and further pushes us to technofacist dystopia where your every move is recorded and your car can be controlled remotely (Tesla can do this already).

    • U7826391786239@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      lol “heart of the car” gtfo

      rear view cameras are nice (though unnecessary), but literally NOTHING else about “infotainment” is worth the extra cost. you think it is because you’ve been convinced you just simply can’t survive without it, and cars can’t even exist without it. why? because $$$

      fuck outta my face with that shit

      so, my takeaway from all this is that toyota is still the best way to go if you for some reason just have to buy a “infotainment” car

      • [deleted]@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Maps/navigation is the one feature that infotainment systems have that is a step up and worth a small amount of cost.

        • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It will be instantly outdated.

          The phone you use is going to be a far better method of navigation. Cars need a dumb screen that connects to your phone and displays the map, problem solved. Although id take all screens out of cars but kids today need a screen or they freak out I guess.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        What options are there that don’t have infotainment garbage without buying something that’s 10 years old?

        • Horsey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I will not buy a car without a 15” screen. I just cannot read directions as fast on any smaller screen. The bigger the information on the screen, the faster I can read it, and the less precision I need with my gaze.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Do people actually want infotainment screens?

      The only thing I can think of wanting a screen for is a backup camera. I much prefer buttons when possible. I thought infotainment screens were just a way for manufacturers to save money on buttons. Why would you want one? Is there something I’m missing?

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        How do you like to get to new places? Turn by turn audio? That mixed with on-screen directions?

        If you like on screen, what is the ideal screen size?

        • Horsey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          12” widescreen is basically my minimum; >15” is ideal. I’d put a 24” in my car if I could.

          • [deleted]@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Agreed.

            Having a maps app that shows directions and current position is pretty handy in new areas, especially if there is construction or heavy traffic to avoid.

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Makes me feel better doing that!

            Still have to check traffic even for short trips since I refuse to waste half an hour in a jam when looking for green/red roads would’ve taken seconds :) then appreciate traffic notifications along the way

            Admittedly don’t do it with paper but have enjoyed learning roads - even played a game kinda, work to home (San Francisco) where I turned right on red for each red I got, forcing me to explore new places (no GPS)

      • Horsey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The bigger the screen for me, the safer it is to gaze over at directions. I wouldn’t drive without directions telling me which way is fastest. No way can a human predict traffic better than computers.

        The cameras might not be “required” to drive, but they do increase precision, which in turn is safer overall.

        Also, the last thing I wanna do is know my area super well, then it takes the excitement out of driving around; the engagement is helpful to keep me from being distracted.

        • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          If cars were designed so you actually had visibility, you wouldn’t Need 500 cameras just to reverse.

          This is why 2000s was peak. You had most creature comforts, and tech wasn’t shoved in our faces, and you could actually see out of your car.