I think it comes down to 2 parts, one being that tarrifs is what were used prior to income tax in the U.S., the time when “robber barrons” thrived and could grow their wealth easily. So the heritage foundation is trying to drive down income taxes and reintroduce tarrifs so they can legally make as much money as possible while not having that money they pull in pay for America’s well being. The second I believe is that the money starts in a separate pile, and ultimately goes to the treasury still, but previously since that “pile” had far less in it before it will look like the government is collecting a lot more money when directly comparing that pile to that pile over than last 50 years. So he can say he increased our revenue by bolognanumber% to show he is doing well, while ignoring that higher costs decreased purchases which in turn decrease states income from sales taxes. So states will make less, and be more dependent on the federal government. Which if the states don’t fall in line, the federal government can/will disperse funds unevenly to states who don’t lap the federal governments balls.
So it comes to a game of taking from the working class and states money/rights as much as possible to keep them fully dependent while growing insanely rich, but not pissed off enough to rebel, or if they do… not have enough resources to be able too.
I think it comes down to 2 parts, one being that tarrifs is what were used prior to income tax in the U.S., the time when “robber barrons” thrived and could grow their wealth easily. So the heritage foundation is trying to drive down income taxes and reintroduce tarrifs so they can legally make as much money as possible while not having that money they pull in pay for America’s well being. The second I believe is that the money starts in a separate pile, and ultimately goes to the treasury still, but previously since that “pile” had far less in it before it will look like the government is collecting a lot more money when directly comparing that pile to that pile over than last 50 years. So he can say he increased our revenue by bolognanumber% to show he is doing well, while ignoring that higher costs decreased purchases which in turn decrease states income from sales taxes. So states will make less, and be more dependent on the federal government. Which if the states don’t fall in line, the federal government can/will disperse funds unevenly to states who don’t lap the federal governments balls.
So it comes to a game of taking from the working class and states money/rights as much as possible to keep them fully dependent while growing insanely rich, but not pissed off enough to rebel, or if they do… not have enough resources to be able too.