• iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 days ago

    I can see this working in places where there’s a single abandoned line and no budget to recover it. I’ve seen plenty of these in SE Asia. A small government investment (skip all the app bullshit etc) could make these work to inter connect small villages that otherwise would waste hours on shitty poorly maintained roads. If it can be made low-tech, I can see this being useful.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      4 days ago

      and unsurprisingly it’s a german project, a country which is absolutely fucking covered in rural lines that are just rusting away

      like, holy shit, can we stop branding everything that isn’t a bog-standard train as “tech bro gadgetbahn”? this thing very explicitly has a specific problem it’s trying to solve.

      • antimidas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Germans had a working solution to this for decades, but apparently gave up on it for some reason (not competitive with road traffic is probably the correct one)

        It was called a railbus and they were once quite prevalent on European branch lines. Finland had and Sweden loads as well, in rural areas, until someone decided that a normal bus is better for some reason.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          the problem is that you still need a driver, so frequency is going to be limited, which makes the service barely usable. Lack of places for vehicles to pass also limits possible frequency on these rural lines.

          the idea behind monocab is that you can just throw more vehicles at the problem, so people can either just order a cab or you can have them constantly circulating like a very strange merry-go-round.

          Railbuses are still good, but they made a lot more sense in the past. These days people have very very little tolerance for waiting.

      • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Trains are expensive, high-capacity vehicles.

        If these small cheap vehicles can repurpose tracks in low demand areas, what’s so bad about it?

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          exactly, i’m catiously optimistic because if this works it could be kinda revolutionary, if rural germans can be convinced to use some form of public transport that’s a huge step towards weaning that hideously car-brained nation off the deathmobiles.

          and the big thing with these is that they just run on normal tracks, so you can just… start running normal trains once you see that ridership with the monocabs is reaching sufficient numbers!

        • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Because 9/10 times they are awful, expensive, unused, and quickly shut down.

          You don’t see any of these niche techslop pods operating anywhere you actually go, because they don’t work.

          • black0ut@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            I don’t know why you’re being downvoted. I’d say you’re wrong, because it’s 10/10 times these things don’t work. I’ve seen many similar projects get proposed, funded and abandoned (even some that really did sound more efficient than this to me). The truth is, standard trains are still the cheapest thing you can put on those rails. They’re simple, repairable, predictable, they don’t break easily, can be easily driven by anyone or automated with standard systems that have been around for decades. Even if a small govt can’t buy a new train, they can get second hand trains from other cities, which will still work perfectly for decades.

          • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            have you actually looked at what we’re talking about, like at all? or are you just following the programming of “small vehicle=bad”?

              • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                on the testing tracks, because it’s new technology and needs to be exhaustively tested before the government allows it to be put into service.

                like, trains were also new technology at one point, being new doesn’t somehow inherently make it bad lmao