• socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    That’s what I’m saying though - it will come down to sworn testimony, and their data from the sensor will likely constitute a preponderance of evidence.

    • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      The burden is on the plaintiff, not the defendant. Whomever brings the suit needs to prove that it’s more likely than not that they’re were incorrectly fined.

      Since these devices seem to basically be VOC sensors it wouldn’t be that hard to do this.