In places where people follow speed limits more than half of the cars are going 5km/h (3mph) below the limit because their speedometer lies and they don’t know. I doubt those people increase their chance of being stopped by police
Does this actually hold up in court? The whole case could be thrown away if there was never a reasonable reason for the traffic stop in the first place.
Depends what the law is where you are, I imagine. I would imagine what constitutes a reasonable suspicion of driving without due care and attention is down to officer discretion. If they wrote you up for only that (assuming the officer does not decide to start suspecting other things, now that they’ve got you there) and you decide to take your chances challenging it in court you’d have a pretty good chance of winning, but of course they make the punishment for taking it to court and losing excessively harsh in comparison to the ticket in order to discourage you from doing that.
I’ve never heard of a case in traffic court where your outcome is worse than the original ticket, except in cases where an officer has reduced 30 over the limit to 20 over the limit, in which case there is a chance you will be charged with 30 over if you lose the case.
The speed limit is the maximum, but it is also the minimum if you’re the kind of person the police are looking for an excuse to pull over.
In places where people follow speed limits more than half of the cars are going 5km/h (3mph) below the limit because their speedometer lies and they don’t know. I doubt those people increase their chance of being stopped by police
Does this actually hold up in court? The whole case could be thrown away if there was never a reasonable reason for the traffic stop in the first place.
No, but we have such a Byzantine legal code that they can often concoct some plausible sounding legal justification anyway.
Depends what the law is where you are, I imagine. I would imagine what constitutes a reasonable suspicion of driving without due care and attention is down to officer discretion. If they wrote you up for only that (assuming the officer does not decide to start suspecting other things, now that they’ve got you there) and you decide to take your chances challenging it in court you’d have a pretty good chance of winning, but of course they make the punishment for taking it to court and losing excessively harsh in comparison to the ticket in order to discourage you from doing that.
I’ve never heard of a case in traffic court where your outcome is worse than the original ticket, except in cases where an officer has reduced 30 over the limit to 20 over the limit, in which case there is a chance you will be charged with 30 over if you lose the case.
Maybe eliminating cars would prevent cops from being able to fabricate traffic incidents to make ticket and arrest quotas?