Thinking about buying an Apple product? Think again. Here are five good reasons to boycott Apple’s iOS. Read on, and learn how you can take action.
Thinking about buying an Apple product? Think again. Here are five good reasons to boycott Apple’s iOS. Read on, and learn how you can take action.
So you’re saying the alternative, allowing free software to be installed without any sort of system check, is what we should be fighting for?
I get that some people don’t want a corporation dictating what they can or can’t do with a product they purchased but I think there’s a whole lot more people who are buying into an ecosystem where we put our trust into the same corporation to protect us from malware running on our devices that contain essentially all our personal information.
Personally, I’d prefer to argue for much, much more restriction on my devices, not less.
That’s not really an Apple argument as much as a media creator argument. Apple is one of dozens of media creators that have been using “DRM” / Copyright protection since the 1980s to prevent source duplication. The fact is that you have the right to copy media that you have purchased for archival purposes. What’s illegal is breaking the lock preventing you from consuming that media on other platforms. The intention here is to prevent you from sharing a legally acquired copy with others. This is why we now purchase a license to consume media, not the media itself. You may not like this restriction but this is not an Apple issue.
😹
This can not be over-shared enough. Apple has even published a paper showing how your information is auctioned off by app developers. You think TikTok is bad? Look up Conde Nast. Again, I wish Apple were more restrictive. The best thing you can do is review what the app does with your information in the App Store before you download it and disable ad-tracking, etc on the device.
I don’t see how you can argue for more freedom to “own” your device while using the argument about protecting your information. The argument should be for more transparency.
The brighter idea would be to promote an open source organization that uses something like blockchain to hold your data while sandboxing it out to apps and operating systems.
Terms of use change all the time. Cooperate strategies and CEOs change all the time, trusting such a fluid system seems stupid. Give us the freedom to audit and modify the systems we use to best fit our needs, like the GNU/Linux operating system allows us to. That is the philosophy behind open source and that is exactly what fsf promote here imo.