It’s something I struggle with. Some bad news comes out about some public persona doing something shitty and they get cancelled. But sometimes I really struggle with giving up the things they’ve made because I like them. There are also occasions where the person has been accused of something and it doesn’t seem true to me, or I think they’re genuinely sorry and have been punished enough, and the context isn’t being considered.

What do you think? Who do you feel conflicted about enjoying?

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    None of them actually get canceled. The only ones who even approach it are the miniscule few who were actually tried and convicted of their crimes. Which we really shouldn’t think of as canceled cause it is what is supposed to happen.

    • MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Well…what I would consider “cancelled” is when a comedian has shows/tours cancelled and/or can’t book a comedy venue…and that’s happened plenty of times, traditionally for being a right wing lunatic. ie Shane Gillis. It’s why the Rogansphere exists. All the shitty hacks who couldn’t book venues can now play at whatever his club is called, in addition to being a podcaster or a move star or influencer or whatever.

      That didn’t happen to Louis CK…he chose to stop playing comedy clubs for a time.