Because of course they are.

AI generated video here:

https://youtu.be/t1ckJdIp_NA

NGL - I kinda want to run around on an AI robot panther. Can we get 4 more, paint them different colors, and merge them into a giant robot? That would be sweet!

  • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I see right to repair nightmare. It’s basically disposable.

    • Ask your shade tree mechanic about fixing this one.
    • I have one that has been sitting in my garage for three years untouched and won’t start - best offer
    • it rides fine there is just a small screeching sound in reverse
    • sometimes it powers off suddenly and collapses at 30 MPH
    • previous owner used it on the snow/beach
    • it fell in the pool once
    • it doesn’t have a charger
    • it gets really hot while charging

    If every instance above is not a giant red flag you’d walk away from, I have a great deal on a bridge to sell you. It is a novelty at best and worthless on any second hand market other than the dealer itself which is basically slavery for the average person. There is not a single standardized part that can be second sourced on such a toy. When the manufacturer no longer supports it, the thing will be disposable. So from a dystopian burn down the world perspective this is a great leap forward. Super cool concept, but unless there is real universal parts standardisation and the thing is fully open sourced, this is like everything that is wrong with the world right now; neo feudalism.

    • Cypher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Kawasaki has a well established dealer network, I don’t see support from them as being the primary issue.

      If Kawasaki motorcycles are anything to go by working on their products yourself isn’t an issue. You can get the full workshop manual and do everything yourself.

      And fell in a pool? You might drive your car into the ocean. Better give up on cars.

      Microwave your phone? Useless!

      Shoot your dog? Planned obsolescence!

      • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        This isn’t internal combustion. Every motor drive will be unique. Robotics are nothing like cars or motorcycles. I’m excellent at working on cars. I’m pretty good with electronics. I mean my bedroom is a Maker lab set up for design and etching my own circuit boards and I have messed around with robotics a bit. I have also ported heads for nostalgia drag, pit for unlimited class sprint, and owned an auto body shop building my hotrod stuff on the side and owned a couple bikes.

        I’m saying, in the real world, shit happens and that adds intelligent perspective on how you’d look at a thing like this when real world stuff has happened. It is hyperbolic for illustrative purpose.

        Such a complex system will inevitably be connected to the internet. Anything that needs dealer support as a crutch is not owned by the end user. If this is not fully transparent and open from the start, it is a means of exploitation. Only fools trust others to do the right thing or care about track records so far. That is feudalism and will result in the dark ages exactly like it did in the past. There is no reason for any consumer to trust-, if an honest product is sold. Honest products are completely open source, and parts can be second sourced from an independent vendor unrelated to the manufacturer, and anyone can potentially replicate the parts and sell them. There cannot be any single choke point where if some asshat quits supporting or goes out of business, the hardware that people paid for fails. Trust inevitably leads to this stupidity, and to exploitation of the built in leverage. It is corporate piracy in the end, and that has to stop.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            Horses are incredibly expensive to house and maintain. I wouldn’t bet on this being more, when you’re not using it you can just stash it in your garage for as long as you want without having to worry about it.

            • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              One site gave an estimate of £3k/yr in annual upkeep to keep one in basic grass livery. A horse costs about £3-4k as well. A lifetime of, let’s say 25 years? That’s a total lifetime spend of £78k.

              Let’s also remember that we’re talking this seriously about an AI generated video of a concept vehicle. No robot horse exists and none will in the near future.

              But, it’s boring to just say “thing no happen”, so in the interest of conversation, what do you speculate the robot horse would cost, if they eventually managed to make a production model? Do you think it’d last as long as a real horse?

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          They state that each leg has it’s own motor so there would have to be some kind of standardization there.

          I can’t imagine electric motors being THAT hard to swap out, I mean, my wheelchair has two of them and they’re user replacable. (Right hand motor and Left hand motor being separate units).

          I’m not sure about user REPAIRABLE, that’s a different deal, but at a minimum user replacable.

          https://www.electricwheelchairsusa.com/products/iq-7000-replacement-motors

          • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            It is quite a bit different in robotics like this. Check out James Bruton on YT for a practical example of open source larger robotics. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUbDcUPed50Y_7KmfCXKohA

            The motors used are almost always brushless because of the speeds accuracy and torque required. That means everything has software and electronics. This stuff gets very complicated fast. Most traditional auto makers are also outsourcing most of their software development and certainly not full stack or ground up oriented. This kind of thing needs to be designed from the start with every potential feature and future thing as part of the initial project. These types of things cannot be expanded easily. Like this is why China is actually good at EVs because they invested in building the whole thing from the bottom up the right way, instead of hack patching garbage and outsourcing.

            • Cypher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              You’re not very familiar with Kawasaki Heavy Industries are you?

              Open source projects aren’t remotely comparable to what the big Japanese manufacturers can do.

              If they ever bring this to market it will be exceptionally complex and require a supply chain that makes your concerns about sourcing parts elsewhere completely irrelevant.

              Ooh brushless motors. Very fancy stuff… I wonder if Kawasaki Heavy Industries has any experience with them?

              Huh seems they build robots already

              https://robotics.kawasaki.com/userAssets1/productPDF/ZX165UFE02001-E.pdf

              • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                Have you ever worked in industry. I spent a couple of years as an operating engineering out of local 12. I worked at asphalt plants as a groundman and loader operator. Most heavy equipment is basically a rental contract with caterpillar or whatever manufacturer. Once the operation is above a certain size, the company is in a position to negotiate contracts that are tens of millions of dollars or more. When a loader or other equipment has an issue, the cat rep sends their team in to do the fix. The only things that are done on site are basic filters maintenance type stuff and when the contract is up, the equipment is replaced.

                In this situation, there is no potential for exploitation because ownership was never part of the equation. There is no room for manipulation because the contract covers everything except basic maintenance. This system is already feudalism. When a feudal lord interacts with another feudal lord, of course they can come to terms because each possesses considerable power. The stupid peasantry has no such negotiable position. Our only power is in democracy where we become the largest power against exploitation. This is how the real big picture world works. There have been various democracies in the past where citizens had power against exploitation, and all of those were fumbled by idiots and fools that allowed consolidation of wealth and assumed that giving power to potential exploitation was okay and that those in power would do the right thing. This NEVER turns out to be the case. Ownership IS democracy and a founding principal of autonomy and self determinism. People that fail to realize this critical factor are ushering in a neo dark age in the exact same fashion as what created the last. The future will look back on our era dumbfounded about epic and unrivalled stupidity of the people that ended post WW2 democracy by just giving it away for nothing of substance. It is unfathomable brain rot on epic scales.

                • Cypher@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  Yes I have worked in industry, no Im not interested in your poorly constructed rants on feudalism.

                  You have no evidence for any of your claims of this proposed product being unserviceable, unrepairable equipment because it doesn’t exist yet and Kawasaki don’t have a track record of such anti-consumer practices.

                  • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    19 hours ago

                    You are a child that cannot handle being wrong, but you are and you have no argument or you would make one. Block me as I have done you. I do not care to engage with children of any age.