• frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    100% agree with the point you’re making and 100% disagree with the math that you did to get there.

    • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Lol you’re right! It looks like the final number I gave was only for 400 years. I didn’t actually reach 533.

      Also I was rounding numbers midway through like a pen and paper physics computation. Since that error scales exponentially, even if I had gotten to 533 the final number was guaranteed to be off.

      Update: fixed it