• Libra00@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They don’t treat it like high tech, they treat it like their granddad’s old beater of a car that somehow never dies or fails to get you where you’re going, but somehow never does a particularly good job either. They treat technology like we treat trees: a brute fact of life with some occasional redeeming qualities.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Just because they don’t treat it like it’s advanced, doesn’t mean it isn’t advanced from our, the audience’s, perspective. Most tech in most sci-fi works is treated as a fact of life, no one goes “holy shit, they just invented hovercars!”.

        • Libra00@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          We’re talking about technology in the context of a story here, so whether or not it’s high tech to the reader is besides the point. Which, as I was trying to elucidate, is that what matters is how the characters treat technology relative to magic, not the audience.

            • Libra00@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Guy’s over here talking about a story involving tech and magic and you’re talking about how sci-fi works? I think you’re confused about how genres work.