• Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    defense argued the men were scapegoats.

    If you are at the top of an organisation then you can you be a scapegoat? You are literally in charge. Your only chance is if an employee committed fraud and deliberately hid something from you.

    • The Menemen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Head of department is middle management. Middle management is certainly the most vulnerable position in situations like this.

      The top manager got a nice compensation and very high pension (according to German media ~€1.3 million per year), while the owners (Piech/Porsche family) still earn billions every year.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Top managers do seem to be targeted.

        CEO Martin Winterkorn’s trial in Germany was paused in 2021 due to health issues, but he remains a key figure under investigation.

        The arrest of Audi’s then-CEO Rupert Stadler in 2018 marked a dramatic shift into current executives.

        Owners responsibility is interesting. I think the concept of limited liability protects them, but should it? If they actively influenced the policy I don’t think it should (but proving that is difficult).