• Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      That’s exactly a security concern from a design point of view. Your desire to trivialize it doesn’t change its nature, access control is access control. That’s not what DNS is for and making it do that is going to cause everyone regret.

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        4 days ago

        You’re not wrong. But if I had to pick between blocking .xxx on my kid’s device or uploading a photo of my ID to various porn sites, I know which one I’m choosing.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          “I want people to accept a bogus solution so this will all just go away.” Okay? But surely you can appreciate that people are not likely to be moved by your bad faith suggestions.

          • मुक्त@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Access to .xxx domains can be mandated to require detection of parental controls, and needing proper age verification if they are not in use.

            Or I am missing some design problem here?