• noodlejetski (he/him)@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    they offer some optimisations to the kernel and the packages that are supposed to yield a tiny bit better performance.

    an incredibly small thing that rubs me the wrong way more than it probably should about their setup is that they set Plasma animation speeds to much higher values than the stock Plasma desktop uses. sure, it could be just a part of their customisation tweaks the same way using fish as the default shell is, but it feels like a cheap trick to reel in the “I installed it on my desktop and it’s soooo much snappier” review kind of people. like, if your work is as good as you claim, you shouldn’t need to artificially make the improvements seem bigger than they really are.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m not familiar with it, but I think that that could be a reasonable UI tweak. I disable virtually all animation in software where possible because I want it to be as responsive as possible and don’t care about the animation. Simply reducing the time in animation is a middle ground—one still gets animations, but cuts out some of the time.

    • ferret@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I set plasma animations to instant every arch install anyway so personally I don’t care 😎 thanks for asking

    • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      If it feels snappier, it is snappier.

      It’s like saying it’s cheating to use instanced rendering to display millions of asteroids when it’s not even real draw calls