Quest to create viable human sex cells in lab progressing rapidly, with huge implications for reproduction

Scientists are just a few years from creating viable human sex cells in the lab, according to an internationally renowned pioneer of the field, who says the advance could open up biology-defying possibilities for reproduction.

Speaking to the Guardian, Prof Katsuhiko Hayashi, a developmental geneticist at the University of Osaka, said rapid progress is being made towards being able to transform adult skin or blood cells into eggs and sperm, a feat of genetic conjury known as in-vitro gametogenesis (IVG).

His own lab is about seven years away from the milestone, he predicts. Other frontrunners include a team at the University of Kyoto and a California-based startup, Conception Biosciences, whose Silicon Valley backers include the OpenAI founder, Sam Altman and whose CEO told the Guardian that growing eggs in the lab “might be the best tool we have to reverse population decline” and could pave the way for human gene editing.

  • Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Productivity has been increasing for decades, but real wages have not kept pace and income inequality continues to grow.

      • Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        This looks like the graph is presenting the compensation line below the productivity in both graphs. In the second graph, the mean and median are represented in such a manner as to indicate that high end outliers are inflating the data set. This is speculative, I know, but certain patterns appear in certain ways for very few reasons.

        Can you share the graph’s definition of ‘Real Producer’ and ‘Real Consumer’? I am specifically wondering if the capitalist-class wage and the working-class wage are represented as a single wage.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          It’s not real consumer/producer, real compensation is inflation-adjusted

          Well, the mean compensation is always going to be higher than the median, right? The graph was originally posted to show that wages grow slower than the productivity. Both graphs are for the workers, but a lot of the difference is mean vs median. There are also other factors.

          For example, total compensation grew faster than wages because company health plans just cost companies more these days. Health care prices grew faster than inflation, so clearly companies had to pay more for them.

          In recent years the real (inflation-adjusted) wage growth has been solid

          The price of groceries in hours worked had been mostly dropping