This is the official short film adaptation of the classic video game Papers Please.

…made in 2018 by a Russian team. Way before the whole Ukraine war thing, you understand. …though I’d obviously love to hear where they are now.

  • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    It is easy to say “they could have left the country. They did not. So they support Putin.”

    Just look at the US.

    • Nico198X@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      it’s not easy. but unfortunately both states are captured. no one else is coming to save them.

      so either the populace rises up as one, or they continue to be abused.

      i don’t think either population has their heart in it anymore.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    …made in 2018 by a Russian team. Way before the whole Ukraine war thing, you understand

    Flipping through a history book on Russian/Ukrainian relations in the 21st century

    Closing the book, putting it back on the shelf, whistling, and walking away

    More seriously, I’ll never understand folks who hear “So-and-so is from Nationality X, so now I must/must not purchase products from them because of their bloodline.”

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s definitely fair, but there is the argument that the largest source of change for major powers is through harming their economies.

      Sort of like, I like the artistry from this person from X nation, but by giving them money, I am indirectly helping fuel the economy of X nation, therefore giving their goverment less incentive to change existing behavior.

      The problem is that in order to achieve that collective impact, a whole lot of innocent parties who have no support for or active hostility for the existing regime are also badly impacted. Usually individuals will greatly suffer before the political or structural systems will ever change.

      So it’s a bit of a bind. Support Russian media, comes with the side effect of supporting the Russian regime, at least indirectly from their income flowing into taxes. End of the day, it’s a choice to make.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s also that you’re fueling their cultural influence. Cultural influence does a lot of sanitization. Look at how japanophiles often fetishize Japan rather than seeing it as a country with good and bad elements. America was particularly good at this conversion.

      • flyingsaucerhat@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’d love to see some data backing this argument up. Doesn’t seem like years of sanctions on Russia, Iran, or North Korea had a sufficient impact to cause any change. Harming the economy can just as likely be used to reinforce the regime by creating a common enemy and blaming them for the people’s hardships (like North Korea does with the USA) On the other hand, use of force was pretty effective in causing change in Nazi Germany or Japan.

        Of course it’s not all straightforward. Change by force can have negative results, and change by economic means can have positive ones. That’s why I’d love to see the data, if there is any

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Doesn’t seem like years of sanctions on Russia, Iran, or North Korea had a sufficient impact to cause any change.

          Seems like it made them more insular, more self-sufficient, and more hostile to future diplomatic entreties.

          Change by force can have negative results, and change by economic means can have positive ones

          What if, instead of trying to extort or kill a nation’s residents in order to force them to adopt your preferred foreign policy, you simply afforded them an opportunity for peaceful coexistence?

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Putin wouldn’t be President of Russia if the US and the USSR had been able to settle their differences without a 60 year long series of proxy wars and regime changes. Neither would Trump, for that matter.

              You played yourselves.

              • Ushmel@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Putin is in power specifically because they settled their differences and Yeltsin was such a drunk idiot that it pushed people to vote for someone who promised stability and prosperity. Putin wasn’t very anti-West until the 2010s. I’m old enough to remember when there was mild talk about Russia joining NATO.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        “You should stop reading books and just listen to random internet strangers” is definitely a take