• null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s an ad-hominem to follow your logic in which you claim that you are now a bigot as a result of this conversation?

    Or is it just that your reasoning is beyond goofy?

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s as hominem to abandon your position and instead insult me, especially after this dumb attempt at a gotcha that is you haven’t figured out also means you agree it’s a sexist slur. So I dunno, good job there genius.

      • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        What position have I abandoned? I’ve simply followed your logic that says anyone who uses the word “manspain” in any context is a bigot.

        Show me the inconsistency.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You doesn’t respond to a single one, you insulted me that’s called abandoninga position to attack me instead ie: ad hominem.

          Nope not at all. I said it’s a bigoted word and if you use it as it’s intended you’re a bigot. This isn’t difficult.

          Show me the inconsistency.

          All the parts you’re intentionally ignoring to make your dipshit gotcha point.

          • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Turns out you weren’t even asking a question you’re demanding an example, your inconsistencies are just stacking up bud.

            Nice try! I was asking you, via question, for an example.

            Which you’ve, once again, failed to produce. I wonder why that could be…

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Nope you’re asking for an example, I answered your question. Two separate concepts boss. Am that aside for like 5 comments you insisted I didn’t answer and just now you agree I did answer. Did you apologize for being rude about it? No, why would ya huh?

              You’re aware I asked you to provide an example before you asked me and you’ve still not provided it. You first homie, let’s see what shit smeared on walls can produce.

              • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                23 hours ago

                What did you ask for an example of? I will happily answer the question instead of sending you on an asinine wild goose chase.

                • Madison420@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  23 hours ago

                  Read. The. Comments.

                  Why do you insist I need to hand everything to you?

                  Ed: wild goose chase? You have to look one fuckin place, one. Why the dramatics?

                  • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    23 hours ago

                    See, I just want to answer your question, but you just seem to want to play this little game.

                    Alright then. So ctrl-f of “example” doesn’t show you asking me for an example of anything.

                    Guess we need to start at the top to see if you’re using some other words to mean “give me an example of X”.

                    Yeah and I’m asking them to use their definition in comparison, how exactly is saying “he’s mansplaining” substantially different then “dei hire”.

                    Is it that?

          • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Max comment depth reached.

            I’m just going to keep asking this question until you either quote your alleged answer, or give a new one:

            Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:

            • assess an interaction she had with a man,
            • deem his behaviour to be “misogynistic”,
            • not be a sexist herself?
            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Neat.

              Keep asking whenever you’d like but I’m not playing this game with you. I provided two separate answers that happen to be the same, just read the comment chain again.

              Literally just read the comment chain and quit asking the same question over and over. You’re not going to get the answer you want with a rapist mentality either boss but it does kinda evidence how gross you’re willing to be.

              • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                It’s funny, every time you’ve accused me of not answering a question, I’ve provided screenshots and direct quotes. Pretty disingenuous of you not to do the same.

                I provided two separate answers that happen to be the same, just read the comment chain again

                I believe that you believe that’s true. But having read that thread, I see nothing resembling an answer to that question. And since you refuse to just quote it, I have to assume it’s just buried in your unreadable grammar and mess of typos.

                So let’s try this again:

                Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:

                • assess an interaction she had with a man,
                • deem his behaviour to be “misogynistic”,
                • not be a sexist herself?
                • Madison420@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  And I’ve directly linked the content chain that provides your answer, so crying because I’m not doing it in a dumber way.

                  Yeah we get it you have a reading comprehension issue, move on.

                  Keep asking the same question and I’m hoping to link the same answer but no no, keep on asking until you get a yes. That’s a reasonable way to act.

                  • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Hmm, okay, I’ll guess again!

                    Is it this?

                    All the parts you’re intentionally ignoring to make your dipshit gotcha point.

                    Because that also doesn’t answer my question, if so.

                  • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Yeah we get it you have a reading comprehension issue, move on.

                    Look who’s abandoning their argument in favor of an ad hominem. What a surprise.

                    Let’s see if I can guess what you think you wrote that answers my question!

                    Is it this?

                    Nope not at all. I said it’s a bigoted word and if you use it as it’s intended you’re a bigot. This isn’t difficult.

                    Because that does not answer my question.

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I have. Many times, you refuse to accept the obvious and ignore everything I’ve said that doesn’t support your point. Why should I prove anything to you at this point, you don’t care about the point you care about winning which is why you insult me when you can’t think of an argument.

              You’re a bully, so why should anyone play with you let alone me?

                  • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    That’s really up to you.

                    You can either demonstrate how your logic doesn’t result in you calling yourself a bigot, or concede that you are one.

                    You keep saying it’s an ad hominem, but I’m not saying your argument is invalid because you’re a bigot.

                    I’m saying either your logic isn’t sound, or if it is, then you must conclude that you are a bigot as a result of it.

                    You refuse to concede that your logic isn’t sound, so therefore…