These are the same sentence, neither is more insulting than the other, neither is sexist though it refers derogatorily to one sex specifically.
Wrong. Would you like me to link you directly to where I defined mansplaining as being “misogynistically condescending”? I’m happy to do that instead of linking to a random comment in the thread and insisting that it’s there somewhere.
You completely skipped over the go away part so you can play this dumb fuckin game.
Then what’s your argument if you agree it’s misogynistic then you agree it’s sexist at which point what is your disagreement aside from you being apparently generally disagreeable and apparently unavailable to leave me alone.
You completely skipped over the go away part so you can play this dumb fuckin game.
I didn’t think you needed my permission to tuck your tail between your legs and run away. But you have it: you’re totally free to stop replying whenever you want.
Then what’s your argument if you agree it’s misogynistic
I’m saying you’re wrong that I equate these 2:
Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.
Bill mansplained baseball to me.
The first would have to be “Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way”
I did. Based on them, your answer would be: Yes. You think a woman using this sentence would be a bigot/misandrist: “Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way”.
So again, to rewind waaaaaayyyyy back: pretty wild that you’re comfortable calling women bigots for calling out one of the most common forms of misogyny they experience.
Wrong. Would you like me to link you directly to where I defined mansplaining as being “misogynistically condescending”? I’m happy to do that instead of linking to a random comment in the thread and insisting that it’s there somewhere.
You completely skipped over the go away part so you can play this dumb fuckin game.
Then what’s your argument if you agree it’s misogynistic then you agree it’s sexist at which point what is your disagreement aside from you being apparently generally disagreeable and apparently unavailable to leave me alone.
I didn’t think you needed my permission to tuck your tail between your legs and run away. But you have it: you’re totally free to stop replying whenever you want.
I’m saying you’re wrong that I equate these 2:
The first would have to be “Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way”
Ya huh rationalize it however you’d like.
So you’re saying a woman using this sentence would be a bigot/misandrist?
“Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way”
Bud. We talked about this, read the comments. I’m not your mommy and this ain’t story time.
You agree with me you’re just being argumentative.
Stop and let your brain catch up with your mouth while you do some reading and reflecting.
Either way.
Go.
Away.
I did. Based on them, your answer would be: Yes. You think a woman using this sentence would be a bigot/misandrist: “Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way”.
Is that correct?
Bless your heart.
Okay, so we can assume that’s a yes then.
So again, to rewind waaaaaayyyyy back: pretty wild that you’re comfortable calling women bigots for calling out one of the most common forms of misogyny they experience.
Real incel-level take, but you do you.