So, obviously there’s a mistake in my reasoning somewhere. Maybe I’ve pointed it out already I’m not sure.

You have a vat with some liquid. The ambient temperature X (which is low and not useful) keeps it at X temperature, a certain base level of energy. Through random collisions as temperature works some will get more energy than the average and get enough energy to evaporate. You separate those passively since it’s literally a phase change it could be done passively? (Leaving you with slightly less energy in the environment but which is in our case infinite since eventually you’d give the energy back before changing it a lot when doing useful things) with the now higher energy particles you have in a separate place?

It automatically turns high entropy useless environment thermal energy into higher more useful energy? (Cascade the same system many times for really high useful energy?)

This only works if the separation step can be done passively (or uses less energy than you gain from it) I guess but that seems maybe plausible considering the phase change?

  • CeffTheCeph@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    If this were true, there would be no observable evidence that any entropic or thermodynamic law exists. How do you hold ‘higher energy particles you have in a separate place’? You would need energy to ‘hold’ those particles. Also, a phase change requires an activation energy, which is more than the ambient. It is admirable that you are trying to solve some serious problems human kind are facing, but if your solution is a perpetual motion machine, there is a mistake in your reasoning. As Homer Simpson has made abundantly clear, “in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics”.