Just because THE TECHNOLOGY IS NOT PERFECT does not mean it is NOT DOING WHAT IT’S intended to do. Sorry I’m having trouble controlling THE VOLUME OF MY VOICE.
It’s not solving the problem because it’s not being implemented properly. If you take a hammer and smash it into the the medium over and over again instead of hitting the nail, is that the hammer’s fault or yours?
Society typically understands “there’s nothing wrong with x” to mean it’s performing within acceptable boundaries, and not to mean that it has achieved perfection.
Just because THE TECHNOLOGY IS NOT PERFECT does not mean it is NOT DOING WHAT IT’S intended to do. Sorry I’m having trouble controlling THE VOLUME OF MY VOICE.
Pick a lane troll
It’s the same lane moron. It can be both imperfect and also nothing wrong with it.
Given that it’s not solving the problem it was implemented to solve, there is something wrong with it. AI is garbage, you can’t change my mind
It’s not solving the problem because it’s not being implemented properly. If you take a hammer and smash it into the the medium over and over again instead of hitting the nail, is that the hammer’s fault or yours?
Society typically understands “there’s nothing wrong with x” to mean it’s performing within acceptable boundaries, and not to mean that it has achieved perfection.
It’s doing neither
If you think so, then you should argue that point instead of trying to short-circuit the argument by being pedantic about a logical inconsistency.