Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

      • cheloxin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        It would be trivial for them to write it so it bans it for citizen use but is allowed for corporate and government use. The people have no rights anymore

    • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This makes me feel like they were in a bind here. The so called “online safety bill” was a tory concoction that took years to pass through the courts because of how invasive it is and how anyone could easily bypass it.

      If labour want to stop it, they’ll be accused of not wanting to protect children.

      Whatever anyone thinks of labour, I’d ask people to ask themselves, if you were in that position, what option do they have other than to let it play out as the spectacular failure it was always going to be and making sure everyone knows who’s fault that was afterwards?

      • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        No. They could put it into a review and quietly shitcan this. It’s not particularly popular. They just want to say they’re protecting kids.

        They’re spineless and Keir is an authoritarian.