it seems to have the reputation of not being the most reliable FS out there, apparently even causing data loss in some instances. In my experience tho it’s been great, it’s snapshot feature has saved me whenever a new kernel would break my broadcom wifi chip
Me following the recent bcachefs drama
(Kent is objectively in the wrong & slightly bat shit, if you follow his many discussions in various forums where he defends himself)
which is so upsetting because dear FUCK does FOSS need a modern FS
I don’t get it, what’s wrong with btrfs? It’s working great for Synology, OpenSuse uses it too
Better yet, what’s wrong with ext4 lol
sooo many things, no: partition pooling, snapshots, integrity checking, data scrubbing, backups, restore
it seems to have the reputation of not being the most reliable FS out there, apparently even causing data loss in some instances. In my experience tho it’s been great, it’s snapshot feature has saved me whenever a new kernel would break my broadcom wifi chip
Most btrfs issues I’ve read of have actually been caused by hardware problems: bad RAM, raid-0 faulty disk
I did find a bug that probably only arch users had to deal with on the most latest kernel. https://www.phoronix.com/news/Btrfs-Log-Tree-Corruption-Fix
It does, but it doesn’t look like Kent will get his shit together. He cannot accept that he might be in the wrong.