• WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Eh, at this point can we just agree that word doesn’t apply to people with actual disabilities? It hasn’t been used as such for decades. Maybe we just agree to only use it to refer to morons, the same way “moron” was once a medical term.

        • Gigasser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Didn’t the words moron and imbecile follow along a similar line of etymological evolution that the r-word went through? Yet imbecile and moron are considered acceptable offensive words to use. To be honest it’s why I don’t really care that much about the r-word itself.

          • Smoogs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Seriously why are you acting like using words is so frigging hard.

            There’s so much worse shit going on in the world as is the entire point of the discussion and this is the hill your choosing to die on here? Mere inconvenience of learning to just use words?

            • Soup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              17 hours ago

              There are many hills to die on, but I have standards and those standards are important. Just pick a better word next time and move on, it’s not that difficult.

              • TJDetweiler@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                How about you just ignore it and move on, instead of asking everyone to pander to your standards? Not to be rude, but no one on the internet gives a shit about your standards, and no one is going to try to comply with them. Use the downvote button if you don’t like the word

                • Soup@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  What a sad person you are, to get so defensive when someone would ask you to not use a word that many people find offensive.

        • reev@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          20 hours ago

          But why? Some people are still hurt by it’s usage, we have other words.

          • moriquende@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Are people actually hurt by its usage or is it another case of “protecting” people who don’t really mind?

            • reev@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I mean I know people hurt by it personally so I don’t use it, to each their own I guess. Surprised that’s a hot take though

              • Smoogs@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                18 hours ago

                speaking about hot takes…. So Why are you still going on about the inconvenience of just changing words? Just learn new words and be done with it. Can’t be that hard. Kids can learn new words every day. I believe in you.

            • skisnow@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              I think about 5% of the time it’s someone who’s actually affected, and 95% of the time it’s performative moralising. Of course there’s no way of telling which time is which…

      • rothaine@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        This is something I’ve been wondering about.

        The r-slur is one of the few words that actually bothers fascists.

        If you call them a “fascist” they don’t care. If you call them a “nazi”, they don’t care. If you call them a “traitor”, some of them care a little bit. These are not insults that get under their skin.

        But if you call them a “retrd" or a "fggot”, it can really rustle their jimmies. In their minds, these are actual insults.

        So if using the slur hurts the fascists more than it hurts the marginalized group, would that usage be justified? Wield the word as a weapon against the fascists, in a way?

        I’m not sure, leaning probably not. But if I see ICE in the street I would like something to yell at them that actually bothers them. Maybe “Trump is a kiddie diddler” will work for a little while.