• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    And there’s lots of valid reasons to not want starlink. So it really doesn’t matter if that’s the only option.

    But…

    The American taxpayers have paid telecom companies billions of dollars on at least two separate occasions years apart to roll out broadband to everyone. But they just keep taking money and not doing it, and then a decade later lobby for the money again.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah, you do make a good point there. I’ve seen that happen. Where a company takes money and doesnt do it. Those companies should be made to repay the money with interest for not doing what they said they would. But I’ve also seen companies that actually do the job and get high-speed internet out to those who wouldn’t have otherwise had it. So I think it really just depends on the company.

      The two companies I’m thinking of right off the top of my head are AT&T and T-Mobile. AT&T took money to roll out broadband and never did so, and T-Mobile merged with Sprint, and said they would roll out high-speed broadband to very rural areas, and actually did do it, and I ended up benefiting from T-Mobile’s home internet rollout.

      I lived in a pretty rural area for a while that had 10 MBPS wired internet or satellite and then T-Mobile came around and with their home internet you could get 70 MBPS so that was a no-brainer