This was bound to happen, and it’s ridiculous

  • icelimit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have a great job lined up in the UK, I’m not sure I can take it up considering that is turning into this kind of shit hole.

    • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wouldn’t take it up, honestly. Best to go for somewhere in the EU instead.

      The UK is a US puppet state, and pretty much showing it.

      • icelimit@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m EU adjacent, with better privacy laws and definitely aware of the role parents need to play in parenting and of government overreach. I’m happy here but dem monies

        • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Hmm, I don’t know your situation, but if you’re living in Switzerland, Norway, the Faroe Islands, or Iceland, I honestly would just recommend staying there.

          If it’s in Serbia, Montenegro, Kosovo, or Bosnia, then yeah, fair. But I thought none of those had good privacy laws?

          Can’t imagine Belarus, Ukraine, Russia, or Turkey have good privacy laws. And certainly not any of the North African countries…

        • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, and they’ve jumped the “protect our kids” wankery into overdrive as well.

          Complete doomer mode: I think they’re also gonna re-establish section 28 soon.

            • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              Section 28 of the 1988 local government act (often just referred to colloquially as section 28), was a law that made it illegal to discuss queer identities in schools.

              here's the relevant excerpt of the act

              2A

              Prohibition on promoting homosexuality by teaching or by publishing material

              (1)A local authority shall not—

              (a)intentionally promote homosexuality or publish material with the intention of promoting homosexuality;

              (b)promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship.

              (2)Nothing in subsection (1) above shall be taken to prohibit the doing of anything for the purpose of treating or preventing the spread of disease.

              (3)In any proceedings in connection with the application of this section a court shall draw such inferences as to the intention of the local authority as may reasonably be drawn from the evidence before it.

              (4)In subsection (1)(b) above “maintained school” means,—

              (a)in England and Wales, a county school, voluntary school, nursery school or special school, within the meaning of the Education Act 1944; and

              (b)in Scotland, a public school, nursery school or special school, within the meaning of the Education (Scotland) Act 1980.”

              It was repealed in 2003, but the recent resurgence of homophobia in parliament is using a similar language around “protecting children” is identical to the shit Thatcher and her cronies were throwing around in the 80’s.

              for example (CW: homophobia)

              • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Oh wow, I hope you’re wrong but who knows at this point considering one of the only noteworthy things they’ve done in the last year is attack trans people. What’s the source of that last image? I’m really hoping that’s one of the examples from the 80s and not a recent one…

                  • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    Thankfully they might struggle a bit more with it as it’s something the public feels a bit more strongly about. I feel like queer people are pretty widely accepted nowadays especially among the younger generations. Whereas with all the privacy stuff they can get away with it because most people either don’t understand or don’t care (or both). Way too many people believe in “nothing to hide nothing to fear”