Anyone know if this is true or not?

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    The issue isn’t so much that they’re banning pornographic content

    I agree with your point but also what the hell, why is this considered a normal well adjusted thing to say…

    (second quote from different person)

    I’m all in for banning pornographic content

    Why? What is the flimsy, unscientific, puritan christian conservative reason and why is it ok for people to force it on everybody else?

    • absentbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah, banning it is wild. I could understand setting it to opt-in, like a lot of websites do for adult content, but removing it entirely is just backwards and hateful.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I don’t know which of us you’re replying to, you seem to be replying to both me and the person I replied to?

      I’m saying it’s actually fine if a privately owned company wants to change whatever content they provide, it happens all the time and nobody bats an eye, but this isn’t that, this is an action by a government to broadly crack down on even what private companies can and cannot do. This is a massive problem that isn’t about porn, it’s about government overreach and government censorship, we have constitutional laws about such things… or had, I am not sure if that’s even a thing anymore.