eah@programming.dev to Wikipedia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoHouses are for living, not for speculationen.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1239arrow-down15
arrow-up1234arrow-down1external-linkHouses are for living, not for speculationen.wikipedia.orgeah@programming.dev to Wikipedia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down5·3 days agoDo you truly, actually, believe that the reign of Mao was a net positive?
minus-squaredylanmorgan@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·3 days agoNo, just that his stance on landlords may be worth revisiting. Adam Smith was also anti-landlord, FWIW.
Do you truly, actually, believe that the reign of Mao was a net positive?
No, just that his stance on landlords may be worth revisiting.
Adam Smith was also anti-landlord, FWIW.