• ronigami@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    How is that easier? That’s just only very slightly harder, not easier. Most sites will not have such sophisticated logic. And anyway, the purpose is to suss out which websites do this kind of tracking and avoid them entirely, not to thwart the tracking.

    • blurb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Technically, yes, most sites won’t have such sophisticated logic. But any Google, Microsoft, or Meta service you use most definitely will.

      I really liked CreepJS’s “Visits” feature where it would show a counter for how many people have visited with exactly the same browser fingerprint (which would usually be 1 unless you were using Tor Browser or Mullvad Browser), but they seem to have removed it for some reason along with “Lies” and “Trust Score”. You can still check it out here though to see just how much identifying information even a simple hobby project can gather in less than a second.

      • ronigami@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That’s a good example of why the goal should be to find services which are less intrusive and less monitoring heavy.