• Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    If you make even a penny of profit, then yes. Housing should never be something someone does to make money. Shelter is a basic human need for survival.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Should buying and selling homes be completely removed as a private institution then? What about land ownership entirely?

      edit: when land ownership is controlled by a position of authority who decides who gets to live where and move where, congratulations, we’re back in monarchy. We can do this smarter without holding completely delusional values.

      • Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yes. Anything that gives people monetary incentive over basic needs should be removed. Keep that shit to things that don’t matter.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          While I get the concept, it’s kind of as realistic as Star Trek. We have a long, long way to go before people will voluntarily want to live in a system where your government owns the land, starting with developing a government that can be trusted and a society that doesn’t feel insecure about where they live or what safety nets they have. I don’t see that happening in the next several thousand years.

    • morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      If you don’t make profit then either you’re losing money or straddling the line between profit and losing money, neither of which is sustainable. Then someone else will come in and try.