Weird how it was their principles but others paid the price. Why don’t they just admit they chose a nap over harm reduction? Given the known correlation between lower voter turnout and crueler candidates winning, should they just admit they abstained so there’d be more genocide?
Weird how it was their principles but others paid the price. Why don’t they just admit they chose a nap over harm reduction? Given the known correlation between lower voter turnout and crueler candidates winning, should they just admit they abstained so there’d be more genocide?