Should OS makers, like Microsoft, be legally required to provide 15 years of security updates?

  • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    You don’t typically pay to run Linux distros. They’re open-source. I can’t imagine they’d be subject to this.

    • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Upgrades are more seamless as well, it’s definitely a bit more blurry of a process. Plus Ubuntu releases twice a year, so their versions are more like the equivalent of Microsoft’s service packs (or whatever they call them now) but on a rolling basis.