schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoChat Control is "like a malware on your device" – Signal slams the EU proposal to scan your private chatswww.techradar.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1446arrow-down12
arrow-up1444arrow-down1external-linkChat Control is "like a malware on your device" – Signal slams the EU proposal to scan your private chatswww.techradar.comschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 month agoI don’t think you can block YouTube channels via DNS.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoinsert joke about the OSI model
minus-squareGreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoAre you stupid? There’s no layer… …oh I see.
minus-squaresuoko@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoYes, I’d rather call it the Ötzi model
minus-squaresuoko@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 month agoDNS should allow us to create a blacklist of sites, it would avoid to trash our phone CPU for some useless antivirus, family link (and I guess other MDM) is already enough. If not the DNS, then family link itself.
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoBut a YouTube “channel” is an application/service specific concept, not exposed in any way dns would be aware of.
I don’t think you can block YouTube channels via DNS.
insert joke about the OSI model
Definitely a layer 8 problem
Are you stupid? There’s no layer…
…oh I see.
Yes, I’d rather call it the Ötzi model
DNS should allow us to create a blacklist of sites, it would avoid to trash our phone CPU for some useless antivirus, family link (and I guess other MDM) is already enough. If not the DNS, then family link itself.
But a YouTube “channel” is an application/service specific concept, not exposed in any way dns would be aware of.