Maybe not that interesting for everyone here, but I found no better community for this.

    • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You can’t really call it slop just because you disagree with their views and representations of things.

      Their stuff is carefully researched and sourced, human crafted and open to critique. Whether they’re correct in their assessments or not is of course up for debate, but it’s good craftsmanship and they show their work.

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Eh, there’s a lot of blending of conjecture, opinion and fact all presented as truth, and their handling of mistakes could be better - they’ve openly said if they consider a mistake to be minor then they don’t even issue a correction or update.

        I personally think that attitude towards production pushes it towards slop, as for things like entertainment one of the key defining things that separate slop from quality media is passion, but if you don’t care about making accurate content then are you any better than just getting AI to write a script?