I think for most people there’s a line between them helping the Yanukovych ousting succeed in non-violent ways and CIA using or being party to violence to achieve that. But everyone has their own line, you drew it at helping at all.
I think you misunderstood. Not drawing a line would mean you condone everything. Nothing would be too much. You’re drawing a line at any sort of help CIA might’ve given, with the reasoning that it is imperialism. So that’s your line
Ok. You might have a point that I condemn imperialism.
However, that was not my initial point. My initial point was how easily imperialism is overlooked if the “good guys” are doing it. Pure James Bond shit.
It’s still imperialism. I’ve stated that they condone imperialism. Nothing more (kicking puppies), nothing less (political violence).
But that’s why the comparison to explicitly condoning violence doesn’t work
I don’t think that there’s much of a difference between one (imperialism) and the other (political violence).
I’m condemning imperialism not because of the violence, but rather because I’m anti-state.
I think for most people there’s a line between them helping the Yanukovych ousting succeed in non-violent ways and CIA using or being party to violence to achieve that. But everyone has their own line, you drew it at helping at all.
With all due respect: I drew jack shit of a line.
Projecting your poliyical power to your political favour outside your own state’s territory is the definition of imperialism.
I called it imperialism, because it is imperialism. Nothing more, nothing less.
I think you misunderstood. Not drawing a line would mean you condone everything. Nothing would be too much. You’re drawing a line at any sort of help CIA might’ve given, with the reasoning that it is imperialism. So that’s your line
Ok. You might have a point that I condemn imperialism.
However, that was not my initial point. My initial point was how easily imperialism is overlooked if the “good guys” are doing it. Pure James Bond shit.