• Carnelian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    My assumption is the non-supplement group would actually perform better. Actual food has tons of other nutrients the body uses for countless other tasks that are directly and indirectly related to muscle building

    • DarkSpoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 day ago

      Typically protein supplements are in addition to regular food not a meal replacement when trying to build muscle.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      The study participants were given protein supplements, not a dietary replacement.

      • Carnelian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Correct, and my assumption is they would perform even better if they were given that protein from food rather than from supplements

        Notably, they would need to do that, otherwise the study would just be comparing higher/lower protein intake and not protein sources

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s not what you said above, you said you thought a group with a regular diet would perform better than a group with a regular diet + protein supplements, which is why you’re getting argued with.

          • Carnelian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            24 hours ago

            which is why you’re getting argued with

            What an interesting way of phrasing why you personally felt the need to make it into an argument rather than simply a discussion of a point that may need clarification.

            Also interesting that “what I said” is totally different from your summary. I stand by what I said. I don’t know why anyone would assume the researches comparing protein sources in this hypothetical would bafflingly allow the control group to consume less protein. Regardless, now that the clarification has been provided, do you have any interest in the topic? Or are you just in an arguing mood today?