I don’t care who you are, those statements are still not the same and I did not make that claim. And I don’t understand why you’re pretending I did unless you’re just like the other person who labels me as “the other side”, assumes a bunch of bullshit about me based on the fact that I added much-needed context, and then there’s nothing I could possibly say that you would even consider.
I don’t care who you are, those statements are still not the same and I did not make that claim. And I don’t understand why you’re pretending I did unless you’re just like the other person who labels me as “the other side”, assumes a bunch of bullshit about me based on the fact that I added much-needed context, and then there’s nothing I could possibly say that you would even consider.
Your “much-needed” (baseless) context: SHES AN ILLEGAL WHO WAS RUNNING FROM THOSE BRAVE ICE SOLDIERS AND DESTROYING AMERICA
P.S. You never blocked me, ding-dong. You also left a piss puddle on the floor 👄
I’m not saying you made that other claim, I’m asking you why you said it looked like she was on the run. Why did you say that?
Do you not see the vehicle moving in the beginning of the clip? While being blocked on all sides?
I didn’t say she was on the run, just that that’s what it looks like. It was really an attempt to highlight the lack of context.
… by confidently volunteering your own immediate assumptions as context? I just don’t know why that seemed like a worthwhile action
You should learn the difference between assumption and speculation.
And no, by pointing out that 100% of context is missing.
Is pure speculation somehow better? It’s not that I misunderstand the difference, either one is warrantless.