Transcription
A Twitter post by Kylie Cunningham @kyyylieeeee that reads “today at the airport one of the drug dogs set off a false alarm and officers rushed over to find out the dog had alerted them for a piece of pizza. the handler just patted his head and goes “it’s okay buddy i know pizza always confuses you” and gave him his treat anyways.”
I guess I reeeeeeally have to hold your hand since you’re too busy master debating to scroll a few inches up and down on this same page. Why should I send you even more studies that you won’t read? You haven’t even read the ones you’ve already been spoon-fed. Yes, these links address my exact statement. You would know that if you read any of them.
https://lemmy.world/comment/20293009
https://lemmy.world/comment/20293055
https://lemmy.world/comment/20293204
no these links to news articles, which i have not seen because their poster is on my ignore list, do not address your exact statement. also, news article is not a scientific study.
the only actual study you sent does not, again, address your claim at all.
have YOU bothered to read it? they all deal with the accuracy of the dogs, none of them suggests stupid take like “the dog is just waiting for its handler to tell him to bark”.
we are talking about dogs working at the airport, i am pretty sure that law enforcement at the airport can check basically anyone when they decide to, and they don’t need some elaborate fraud to do that, so your whole conspiracy does not make sense at all.