• lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Witnesses who are too far away to see their identification can still see their face to ID them. Undercover cops are a different situation than what ICE is doing and really shouldn’t be making arrests IMO. In winter they can take their mask off to interact with people.

    If we ban law enforcement from wearing masks, that opens the door to banning masks in public.

    It doesn’t. The general public doesn’t need to be identifiable at all times like cops do.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Witnesses who are too far away to see their identification can still see their face to ID them.

      Sure, I just don’t think that’s a reasonable thing to require at all times.

      Instead, the public should be free to approach to a safe distance to film, and then attempt to talk with law enforcement when safe. A police officer is required to identify themselves to the suspect due to the fourth amendment. Whether they are required to identify themselves to the public is up to local law, court precedent, and agency policy.

      The general public doesn’t need to be identifiable at all times like cops do.

      Neither do. Police only need to be identifiable when using their authority, such as when making an arrest or dealing with protests, and in the latter case, only agency affiliation is necessary.