• whimsy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    23 hours ago

    This is a bit defeatist, wouldn’t you agree? A lot of people use the same argument to fight against climate protection actions

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That is not apples to apples. One is scientific and an opinion on our effect on this living breathing rock. The other is objectively correct. Capitalism is everywhere. In varying degrees and control.

      • Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Capitalism is everywhere. So are our efforts to destroy our ecosystem. Changing it at this point seems unrealistic. I mean, you could make this point, but it is indeed defeatist. But to be fair, on short term I would also pick severely limiting and controlling capitalism over a sudden revolution. As a start, let’s get rid of billionaires. That would help making any change further down the road, because there won’t be a class of people with incredible power that will try to prevent any change.

        • GladiusB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It’s not defeatist to say the sky is blue and we breath oxygen but we need to optimize keeping the sky blue and the right amount of oxygen. Would I be ok with an alternative? Absolutely. But I don’t see one and I am asking all that object my observation to present a viable alternative.