andros_rex@lemmy.world to InsanePeopleFacebook@lemmy.world · 1 month ago“the Yu-Gi-Oh deck theorycrafting”lemmy.worldimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up189arrow-down12
arrow-up187arrow-down1image“the Yu-Gi-Oh deck theorycrafting”lemmy.worldandros_rex@lemmy.world to InsanePeopleFacebook@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareGhoelian@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 month ago do not factor in the high scores from my tests […] while keeping the test scores in mind That’s already one way of making the ai output more unreliable. Not that it was ever reliable to begin with of course.
minus-squareBobo The Great@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoAlso doesn’t that mean Mr. Robert here fed chatgpt some numbers, that are presumably in the 120-130 range?
minus-squareQuizzaciousOtter@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoAm I misunderstanding something or does this instruction contradict itself? “do not factor in” and then “keeping test scores in mind”.
minus-squareGhoelian@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agoYes exactly, and in my experience that’s a sure-fire way of tripping up the ai.
minus-squareQuizzaciousOtter@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoThanks for the confirmation. I actually considered that I just lost something in translation because of how weird this prompt is. I mean, what did they even try to say?!
That’s already one way of making the ai output more unreliable. Not that it was ever reliable to begin with of course.
Also doesn’t that mean Mr. Robert here fed chatgpt some numbers, that are presumably in the 120-130 range?
Am I misunderstanding something or does this instruction contradict itself? “do not factor in” and then “keeping test scores in mind”.
Yes exactly, and in my experience that’s a sure-fire way of tripping up the ai.
Thanks for the confirmation. I actually considered that I just lost something in translation because of how weird this prompt is. I mean, what did they even try to say?!