Yea I’d say that it isn’t proof of absence. But it is evidence. Having absolutely no evidence for something means all the evidence that exists does not support that thing. That is evidence of its absence.
Personally, I’d clarify that absence of study isn’t evidence of absence. If something has been extensively studied only to find no evidence, that suggests that study should probably be spent somewhere else.
Often you are already studying something else. Imagine you are studying something extensively and you find that everything points in one direction and someone posits something in a completely different direction but none of the evidence lines up with that completely different direction but doesn’t necessarily prove it wrong because maybe there’s no way to prove it wrong. Look at Evolution and intelligent design. Everything points to Evolution and nothing points to an intelligent designer but you can’t prove an intelligent designer incorrect because there’s simply no evidence of the intelligent designer. Might as well be magical pixies. However all the evidence for things evolving mean that we use that evidence as our supposition.
sometimes it is though.
Yea I’d say that it isn’t proof of absence. But it is evidence. Having absolutely no evidence for something means all the evidence that exists does not support that thing. That is evidence of its absence.
Personally, I’d clarify that absence of study isn’t evidence of absence. If something has been extensively studied only to find no evidence, that suggests that study should probably be spent somewhere else.
Often you are already studying something else. Imagine you are studying something extensively and you find that everything points in one direction and someone posits something in a completely different direction but none of the evidence lines up with that completely different direction but doesn’t necessarily prove it wrong because maybe there’s no way to prove it wrong. Look at Evolution and intelligent design. Everything points to Evolution and nothing points to an intelligent designer but you can’t prove an intelligent designer incorrect because there’s simply no evidence of the intelligent designer. Might as well be magical pixies. However all the evidence for things evolving mean that we use that evidence as our supposition.