A federal judge on Saturday temporarily locked down the Justice Department’s access to some evidence used in its criminal case against former FBI Director James Comey, just as the Trump administration prepares to seek a new indictment after the dismissal of previous charges early last week.

The judge’s order sets up a fast-moving emergency court proceeding over this week that could exclude key pieces of evidence from any future proceeding against Comey, potentially limiting what prosecutors may present to a grand jury after his previous case was dismissed for different reasons.

  • Goku@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The only reason Trump wasn’t indicted in the 2016 Russian meddling case is because Comey played the role by the books, a straight arrow. There was enough evidence to indict Trump. The writing was on the wall, but Comey wanted to present the facts and remain neutral.

    Trump owes Comey for this. Comey could have used that special investigator role to smear the president but he didn’t.

    • santa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      He won’t do any favors for anyone. This is how he lives every breath of his pathetic life. His benefit to your intentional suffrage.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s been a minute but as I recall he did not treat evidence of wrongdoing the same between Hillary and Trump.

      The case against Comey is ridiculous, but frankly, he is having the day he created in the first place. Fuck that guy. Not that I think he should be found guilty of anything here, but I’m not celebrating his win here, just Trump’s loss.

  • mkwt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    This is a different judge in a different district than the one who handled the Comey indictment.

    The lawsuit was filed by Dan Richman, who wants his personal data returned to him. The data was seized in 2019-2020 under search warrants, but the public learned in Comey case filings that the FBI failed to exclude non pertinent data, violating the terms of the original warrants. Among other problems.

    In the previous Comey case, nearly all of the evidence that the government presented against Comey came out of these warrants. And it’s not clear if they have any other sources of evidence.