Yep, I definitely think the whole phrasing of that comment is unusual. I understand the basic facts they are stating, but not the point of stating them.
My original comment? I just answered your question as to what that other commenter meant by “amendment 2.” I didn’t say anything else? Did you not want someone else to answer your question and only want that commenter to?
The world is at the brink of war because 1 man was used as a parrot, and you haven’t cauton yet?
Let me debrief you.
Man in Whitehouse is grifter who doesn’t care about anyone… being used by governments around the world (Russia, SA) to get what they want. It doesn’t end there
The right to bear arms.
right to own bear arms.
Oh. Usually it’s phrased as second amendment.
Yep, I definitely think the whole phrasing of that comment is unusual. I understand the basic facts they are stating, but not the point of stating them.
I’m confused about what your point was in your original comment. I don’t get the relevance?
My original comment? I just answered your question as to what that other commenter meant by “amendment 2.” I didn’t say anything else? Did you not want someone else to answer your question and only want that commenter to?
Oh sorry. Everyone on this site feels like the same person to me except for @[email protected]
The world is at the brink of war because 1 man was used as a parrot, and you haven’t cauton yet?
Let me debrief you.
Man in Whitehouse is grifter who doesn’t care about anyone… being used by governments around the world (Russia, SA) to get what they want. It doesn’t end there