• g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.worldEnglish
    421·
    3 days ago

    However, as we have stated many times, the UN can no longer afford to waste its resources where there is little or no impact. Unfortunately, this resolution is another example of the type of performative document that does little more than waste UN and Member State resources while failing to meaningfully improve the lives of our collective citizenry.

    I mean there are worse reasons to vote no. I also hate bureaucracy, but this seems like an odd resolution to make that point on…

    In addition, the Trump Administration has been clear that efforts to advance radical gender ideology in the UN will not be supported

    Jesus fucking christ

    • mystic-macaroni@lemmy.ml
      2·
      1 day ago

      That entire passage was performative. It’s the performer calling the performer performative. But who is the most performative? Probably, as you pointed out, the who who brings up rAdIcAl GeNdEr IdEoLoGy

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      4·
      2 days ago

      Before I read the statement I was sure they were gonna go with “we rejected it because it doesn’t go far enough” 😂

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      1·
      2 days ago

      Imagine taking anything anyone from this administration says at face value. They want to be able to murder people, plain and simple.