ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 7 hours agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1182arrow-down12file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1180arrow-down1external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 7 hours agomessage-square50fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareStern@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·7 hours agoI presume they’re okay with the first surveillance cameras being in their bedrooms then.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·6 hours agoI feel like the best way to combat this is to dig up info on politicians and release it all publicly. Nothing illegal about that. If I knew how, I would.
I presume they’re okay with the first surveillance cameras being in their bedrooms then.
I feel like the best way to combat this is to dig up info on politicians and release it all publicly. Nothing illegal about that. If I knew how, I would.