cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/23975491

The announcement reply in the (from original developers rejected) Feature Request issue: https://github.com/FreeTubeApp/FreeTube/issues/4447#issuecomment-3697918113

And the repository: https://github.com/D3SOX/FreeTube

And for Arch users in the AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freetube-git-d3sox

There is a new fork of FreeTube that implements a (at least by me) long wished feature: Save video playback speed setting for each channel separately. He plans to do a Flatpak version maybe and its already in the AUR.

I personally have trust issues to run unknown forks and rely on them, for security and other reasons. So for now I won’t use it unfortunately. But maybe someone else is interested.

  • Grey Cat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Just seems a little too light on added features for a whole fork. Maybe if the forker does as he says and implements other rejected features it might be worth it. Depending on what those features are.
    Good luck to him.

  • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is this fork going to keep up each time g∞gle decides to play cat & mouse? We’re about due for another round.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I don’t know the exact process, but I think its still based on the original, with the changes and additions on top of it. So it depends on the FreeTube team to keep up. I imagine its similar how the Firefox forks work, that still depend on the original Firefox.

  • N.E.P.T.R@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sound like exactly what I have been wanting, though i will never use this fork for something so small and without a Flatpak.